Evaluation

Throughout the project, the researcher will evaluate the curriculum implementation process and the outcomes of the pilot initiative to inform curriculum revision. The development of evaluation questions and selection of methodology follows the purpose of the evaluation.
 * Evaluation Overview and Procedures** (MUST BE REVISED FROM FIRST DRAFT)

//Process Question:// • How is the modified curriculum module being implemented? 1. What barriers exist to implementation? 2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the modified curriculum according to teacher’s perspectives?

//Outcome Question:// • What is the fidelity of the implemented curriculum modifications to the theoretical 21st Century framework?

The strengths of the evaluation questions include the attention to process and outcomes when assessing the initiative. Also, another strength of the questions is the clearly outlined method of data collection based on the design matrix. The attention to utilize a mixed methods approach allows for greater differentiation in data collection methods to anticipate possible information or occurrences emerging throughout the implementation process. However, the project cannot possibly anticipate all challenges that can emerge in a public school environment. The dynamic nature of human beings and human relationships fuel a sometimes sensitive environment that will have to be navigated by the researcher, who is also a participant. It is crucial to maintain objectivity as a researcher despite participation within the project.

A weakness of the proposed project design could be the theoretical framework that is used as a basis for comparison. In essence, the theoretical framework will stand as a static shadow of the field during its development. It will not live and breathe with emerging discoveries and theory. This weakness could impact the evaluation’s ability to provide an answer to the question, as the flowing living curriculum will be compared to a still sedative theoretical framework. While the researcher will be able to answer key questions, it may not be in the way that is expected at the onset of the project. However, the discrepancies that surface during the project development and implementation will serve the overall purpose, informing the review and revision of the ultimate curriculum document, in the end.